Switzerland Peace Summit: A Comprehensive Analysis

The Switzerland Peace Summit

The Switzerland Peace Summit

The Switzerland Peace Summit concluded with the publication of a final joint communique, addressing critical issues and proposing measures to achieve a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace in Ukraine. This report summarizes the main points of the communique, the participation and response of various countries and organizations, and the implications of the positions taken by the BRICS countries and other non-signatory states.

Key Points of the Joint Communique
Control of Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant

The communique called for the return of the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant under full Ukrainian control. This measure is essential for the safety and security of the region, ensuring that the plant operates without the risk of military interference.

Prohibition of Nuclear Threats

The document emphasized the inadmissibility of any threat or use of nuclear weapons. This stance reaffirms the global commitment to nuclear non-proliferation and the prevention of nuclear escalation.

Food Supply and Security

The uninterrupted manufacturing and supply of food products in Ukraine were highlighted as crucial. The communique stressed the importance of maintaining agricultural productivity and food security, given Ukraine's significant role in global food supply chains.

Maritime Navigation and Port Access

The communique advocated for the free, full, and safe commercial navigation, as well as access to seaports in the Black and Azov Seas. It condemned attacks on merchant ships and civilian ports, labeling such actions as unacceptable. This measure aims to ensure the stability of international trade routes and the safety of maritime operations.

Release of Prisoners and Civilians

The release of all prisoners of war and the return of all deported Ukrainian civilians were called for. This humanitarian demand underscores the need to respect human rights and international humanitarian law.

Respect for Territorial Integrity

The communique reinforced the principles of the UN Charter, particularly the respect for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of all states. This principle is deemed fundamental to achieving a lasting peace in Ukraine.

Participation and Signatories

Out of approximately 100 countries and organizations participating in the summit, 80 countries and 4 European institutions signed the communique. This broad support demonstrates a significant international consensus on the outlined measures and principles.

Non-Signatory Countries and Their Reasons
BRICS Countries

The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) abstained from signing the communique. Their reasons include:

Non-Invitation and Non-Attendance: Some were not invited or chose not to attend.
Disagreement with Wording: The communique referred to the conflict as a "war" rather than Russia's preferred term "special military operation," and held Russia responsible for the conflict and its global repercussions.

Other Non-Signatories

Other countries that did not sign include Armenia, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Indonesia, Bahrain, Colombia, Thailand, Mexico, and the United Arab Emirates. Their reasons align with those of the BRICS countries, primarily concerning the language used and the direct attribution of responsibility to Russia.

Analysis of Non-Signatory Positions
Peace Negotiations Proposal

The non-signatory countries, particularly Brazil and China, have advocated for an international peace conference involving both Russia and Ukraine. Their proposal emphasizes de-escalation without distinguishing between the aggressor and the victim, calling for no expansion of the battlefield, no escalation of fighting, and no provocations. However, this stance overlooks the ongoing illegal occupation of Ukrainian territory by Russia and the latter's reluctance to negotiate in good faith.

Division and International Law

The non-signatory countries argue against dividing the world into isolated political or economic groups. However, their refusal to support the communique and uphold international law principles, such as those in the UN Charter, contributes to increased geopolitical discord between BRICS and Western nations.

The Switzerland Peace Summit's joint communique represents a collective effort to address the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and establish a framework for peace based on international law and respect for sovereignty. While the significant support for the communique reflects a broad international consensus, the abstention of key countries like the BRICS and others underscores the complexities and divergent perspectives in achieving global unity on this issue. The ongoing challenge remains to reconcile these differences and work towards a sustainable and just resolution for Ukraine and the broader international community.


পাঠকের মন্তব্য