Arvind Kejriwal's appeal for medical assistance

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's recent plea for medical assistance while in judicial custody has sparked a contentious debate between his legal representatives and the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Kejriwal, citing acute diabetes and fluctuating blood sugar levels, seeks specific medical interventions, including daily consultations with his doctor via video conferencing and the administration of insulin.

Kejriwal, under medical supervision since February 1, embarked on an 'Insulin Reversal Programme,' effectively transitioning from exogenous insulin to oral medication while meticulously monitoring his glucose levels with a continuous glucose monitoring sensor. However, his arrest on March 21 disrupted this regimen, raising concerns over his health management while in custody.

Kejriwal's Plea

In his plea, Kejriwal emphasizes the necessity of medical supervision and insulin administration to control his blood sugar levels, alleging negligence in providing adequate medical care during his detention. He asserts that despite his requests, basic insulin administration and adherence to the Insulin Reversal Programme were not facilitated by the authorities.

ED's Response

The Enforcement Directorate counters Kejriwal's claims, alleging deliberate consumption of sugary items by Kejriwal despite his diabetic condition, aiming to manipulate a medical emergency for favorable legal treatment. They present a diet chart purportedly documenting Kejriwal's dietary habits, suggesting non-compliance with prescribed guidelines.

Contentious Points

The conflicting narratives between Kejriwal and the Enforcement Directorate underscore the contentious nature of the plea. While Kejriwal alleges medical neglect and vindictive behavior, the ED accuses him of manipulating his health condition for legal advantage, casting doubts on his compliance with dietary restrictions.

Arvind Kejriwal's plea for medical assistance amidst legal custody highlights the intersection of health and legal considerations in high-profile cases. The ongoing dispute underscores the need for transparent medical documentation and impartial evaluation to ensure fair treatment and uphold the integrity of legal proceedings.